Saglemi Housing Project Brouhaha: APC Nat. Comm. Officer Descends Heavily on Works & Housing Minister

Saglemi Housing Project Brouhaha: APC Nat. Comm. Officer Descends Heavily on Works & Housing Minister

Report By: Ishmael Barfi

In the wake of the Saglemi Housing Project brouhaha, the National Communications Officer of the All People’s Congress, (APC) Francis Ansah Tawiah has decended heavily on the Works and Housing Minister, Francis Asenso Boakye for chastising Dr. Hassan Ayariga.

Dr. Hassan Ayariga who is the founder and leader of the APC last week shared a video of the Saglemi Housing project left to rot after millions of cedis have been put into the construction of these unit houses on various social media platforms about his plan to mobilize homeless Ghanaians to occupy the abandoned SAGLEMI HOUSING project.

Saglemi Housing Project
Saglemi Housing Project

In a press release issued and signed by the National Communications Officer of APC, Francis Ansah Tawiah copied to charged the Sector Minister to focus on completing the project and stop whining.

According to him, “Ghanaians are not interested in the number of times the minister has gone to site but rather measures put in place to compete the project”.

Interestingly, the APC Nat. Communications Officer revealed that,  their interaction with Ghanaians indicate that, majority of Ghanaians have already bought the idea of occupying the facility due to the lackadaisical attitude of the Government in completing the project.

Therefore he hinted that, “the mobilization of homeless citizens will commence soon if the Sector Minister fails to come out with a concrete plan.


The Saglemi Housing Project was essentially approved by Parliament on October 31, 2012, after the consideration of a Report of the Joint Committee on Finance and Works and Housing on the project’s associated loan agreement.

The loan agreement was between the Government and Credit Suisse International for US$200,000,000 for the construction of 5,000 affordable housing units by Construtora OAS Limited.

The deal was for the construction of 5,000 affordable housing units and was first laid in Parliament on September 28, 2012.

It was thus referred to a Joint Committee on Finance and Works and Housing for consideration and report back to Parliament in accordance with the Constitution and the Standing Orders of the House.

At the time of the agreement, Ghana’s housing deficit was estimated to be about 1,700,000 units.

The loan had a grace period of two years before the repayment period of five years and the maturity period of seven years.

The loan was pegged at an interest rate of 12.5 percent per annum on the cedi equivalent of the dollar loan amount based on the exchange rate at the time.

The Committee at the time observed that the 12.5 percent cedi interest rate on the facility was “far lower than the treasury bill rate, hence making the facility very economical.”

The projected total debt service under the project was at the time estimated at US$249.6 million while total sales proceeds were projected at US$251.27 million, thus leaving a surplus of US$1.8 million.

The project was expected to be completed within two years after the commencement of works.

The scope of the project was however reviewed which reduced the number of housing units to be constructed from 5000 to 1,502 even though the price remained at US$200,000,000.

The Akufo-Addo government after assuming office however said there was no evidence justifying the variation of the Scope of the Agreement.

In seconding the motion for the approval in Parliament, a Ranking Member of the Committee, Dr Akoto A. Osei said, of all the housing projects the House had assessed, this was one of the few that already had an offtaker arrangement with the Ghana Home Loans Board.

He said there were at least, 15,000 people who had applied, 5,000 of whom have already made financial commitments.

But over eight years on, the housing project remains unoccupied.

Among the expected benefits of the project, the committee cited:

Improved local economy arising from the increased housing expenditure;Generation of commercial and service facilities such as shops, banks, restaurants and recreational; amenities in the communities leading to increased productivity and higher standard of living;Promoting effective and efficient utilization of land;Engagement of high performing local sub-contractors;Creation of both direct and indirect jobs.

The committee expected that in all, about 6,300 direct and indirect jobs were expected to be provided for labourers, artisans, professionals and sub-professional, administrative staff, building material suppliers, food sellers, security and drivers


236 View(s)